Remediation, Redress & Section 166

From time-to-time regulated firms must take corrective action to put things right for groups of customers who have not received fair treatment. This can be when firms have proactively identified failings, in response to FCA updates or, in more serious cases, under a ”Section 166”. Remediation must be done properly otherwise the FCA can insist that it is done again, and take further enforcement action. The regulator also expects firms to learn from remediation exercises, identifying and fixing historical problems so they don’t happen again in the future.

Remediation is a retrospective process where a firm investigates customer cases and issues compensation (redress) to customers who have not received fair treatment. These activities must be carried out by experienced case handlers with robust processes to ensure they are objective, impartial and fair. In some situations, the issue under review may affect only a handful of customers, whereas others may have affected large numbers of customers over a long period of time.

Not only may remediation activities demand specialist expertise to set-up and manage, they are also likely to be beyond normal staff levels. CCAS can provide the capability and the capacity to undertake these kinds of projects. We can ensure that you have the right people and the right processes, quickly scaling up and remaining flexible to meet your changing needs.

For many of our clients we provide a fully managed service. This includes everything from programme design and set-up through to delivery and performance management. CCAS can also ensure that learnings are used to mitigate future failings. Taking this approach means that you can be confident that your remediation programme is up to regulatory rigour and carried out most efficiently.

To find out how we can help you with remediation, get in touch with us today by clicking the button below.


Get Advice Now

Articles

Motor Finance: changes to rules on commission

We have now reviewed FCA Consultation Paper CP19/28 “Motor finance discretionary commission models and consumer credit commission disclosure”. This proposes a number of changes to CONC rules, some of which apply just to the motor finance sector and others of which apply to all sectors. Equally some of the rules changes only apply to regulated …

October 16, 2019 at 8:51 am

FCA Guidance on Vulnerable Customers

FCA has now issued GC19/03; draft guidance consultation on vulnerable customers. GC19/03 will be subject to a two-stage consultation process the first of which finishes on 4th October. The draft guidance is relevant to all regulated firms dealing with retail customers. Retail customers are those who are acting outside of their trade, business or profession. …

August 2, 2019 at 10:38 am

Can Gabriel be made better?

On 16/07/2019 the FCA published the news that they’re planning to replace Gabriel. Gabriel is the regulators main data collection system. It facilitates the collection of over 500,000 submissions annually, across 120,000 users and 52,000 firms. Many users will welcome the news. Since it’s introduction in 2008 the system has been plagued with a series of …

July 17, 2019 at 3:02 pm

Why engagement matters for compliance training

Mention “compliance training” to anyone in business and you’ll probably get a roll of the eyes and a deep sigh. And if there’s any suggestion of having to undertake the said training there may even be a feeling of unease. Compliance training has a pretty bad reputation. Traditionally compliance training has been poorly delivered. So …

July 9, 2019 at 3:03 pm