Remediation, Redress & Section 166

From time-to-time regulated firms must take corrective action to put things right for groups of customers who have not received fair treatment. This can be when firms have proactively identified failings, in response to FCA updates or, in more serious cases, under a ”Section 166”. Remediation must be done properly otherwise the FCA can insist that it is done again, and take further enforcement action. The regulator also expects firms to learn from remediation exercises, identifying and fixing historical problems so they don’t happen again in the future.

Remediation is a retrospective process where a firm investigates customer cases and issues compensation (redress) to customers who have not received fair treatment. These activities must be carried out by experienced case handlers with robust processes to ensure they are objective, impartial and fair. In some situations, the issue under review may affect only a handful of customers, whereas others may have affected large numbers of customers over a long period of time.

Not only may remediation activities demand specialist expertise to set-up and manage, they are also likely to be beyond normal staff levels. CCAS can provide the capability and the capacity to undertake these kinds of projects. We can ensure that you have the right people and the right processes, quickly scaling up and remaining flexible to meet your changing needs.

For many of our clients we provide a fully managed service. This includes everything from programme design and set-up through to delivery and performance management. CCAS can also ensure that learnings are used to mitigate future failings. Taking this approach means that you can be confident that your remediation programme is up to regulatory rigour and carried out most efficiently.

To find out how we can help you with remediation, get in touch with us today by clicking the button below.


Get Advice Now

Articles

FCA Senior Managers and Certification Regime – 3.0 From the UK with Love

Introduction The SM&CR was developed as a result of the 2008 financial crisis and the outcry from the public following its perception of the lack of accountability and punishment of those running and controlling the banks and other financial sector firms, whilst by way of the ripple effect, the public paid the economic price for …

October 30, 2018 at 4:14 pm

FCA Senior Managers and Certification Regime – 2.0 Enforcement

Introduction The SM&CR was developed as a result of the 2008 financial crisis and the outcry from the public following its perception of the lack of accountability and punishment of those running and controlling the banks and other financial sector firms, whilst by way of the ripple effect, the public paid the economic price for …

October 26, 2018 at 9:42 am

FCA Senior Managers and Certification Regime – 1.0 Background

Introduction By and large, responsibility for the 2008 financial crisis has been laid at the doors of the banking sector, and in response, Parliament set up the Parliamentary Commission for Banking Standards (PCBS) with a mandate to recommend how standards in the banking sector could be improved. PCBS identified that firms should take more responsibility …

September 25, 2018 at 11:06 am

P2P faces tougher rules

Previously the peer to peer (P2P) lending sector had only been on the fringes of consumer credit regulation. With the transfer of consumer credit to FCA in 2014, P2P platforms were recognised as a regulated activity under a new category, “operating an electronic system in relation to lending”. In 2016 FCA launched a post implementation …

August 13, 2018 at 9:53 am